Offering sample rate and bit depth options just like WAV files, AIFF registers the audio waveform as accurate samples slices using PCM to offer the highest possible audio recording quality and sound replication. It mainly boils down to history. AIFF was created by Macintosh in , allowing full studio-quality audio recording and playback on Apple computers.
With the boom of internet file-sharing in the mids, people quickly realized sending uncompressed files over dial-up connections was impractical—and oftentimes impossible. With compression algorithms that were capable of achieving impressively small file sizes, MP3 became a staple of the internet era and has maintained its strong position to date.
However, small file size came at the cost of sound quality. Take the pair of images above. On the left, you can see every little wrinkle and color vividly. A highly compressed image on the right , however, becomes very pixelated and loses all of the clarity and detail. The same happens when you compress an audio file.
Different compression formats use varying methods to re-encode the data in a way that saves space. But this saving of space means some data has to get lost in the process. The lower the encoding quality, the more frequencies and details will get lost in your audio. So if you want to maintain good quality, yet still make use of the fact that MP3s are easy to share with friends and family, keep your bitrate above Kbps kilobits per second.
Often seen as the successor to the MP3, this Mac-centric compressed audio format found its true place with the birth of the iTunes Store, where it became the primary format for all music purchases made through the online music store. It is still the preferred format for all audio included in apps that are released on the Mac and iOS App Stores, as well as Nintendo and PlayStation products.
This results in smaller file sizes, all while delivering higher audio quality. When deciding which audio format is right for you, the first question you have to ask is whether the file needs to provide uncompressed audio or can it be in a compressed audio format?
Additionally, following the Red Book standard to provide for the ultimate listening experience, CD-quality audio should use uncompressed audio files at On the other hand, if your intent is to make sharing your music easy and fast, choose a compressed audio format that will provide you with small file size.
At that point, convenience will always win. Additionally, since email providers limit attachment sizes and smartphones have limited storage space, any audio format that can offer smaller file sizes is going to be a winner. For all of those instances, choose a compressed audio format like MP3 or M4A. The smaller the file, the worse the audio quality will be.
Well, that will really depend on your use case. For starters, the historical prevalence still stands today. The great news is, regardless of which of the two formats you choose, you will achieve exactly the same superb audio quality. The majority of desktop and mobile devices sold nowadays come with native support for MP3 and M4A files alike.
For higher quality results, I recommend you choose M4A, which can offer higher sonic results at the same settings, all while still resulting in smaller file sizes than MP3. On the other hand, if guaranteed compatibility is what you need most, MP3 will probably be the wiser choice of the two. I hope that this guide was able to shine some light on the difference between the four basic audio formats and when to use them.
No one wants to download a 50mB file to listen to song on their phone, or send a quick tune to a friend. In fact, mp3 is just a video file, without the video part. For illustrative purposes, imagine the top image is your full quality audio file, and the bottom is your downsampled mp3. The bottom image lacks the perceived clarity and depth of field of the image.
This is a similar visual concept to how mp3s and other lossy formats are able to get a pretty close to the original file, but lacks the data to fully represent the full waveform. Image before Downsampling Data. This image shows how a downsampled image can be lower quality than the original to save space. Generally, it looks about the same, but closer inspection shows loss of detail.
The top image would represent a WAV or AIFF, and the bottom image would represent a MP3 or Mp4, although the image is a not an actual representation, but for illustrating how compression affects quality. Originally developed by IBM and Microsoft, Wave files are a raw audio format from before people had the internet.
While it is very old, the format is very basic, and is essentially a mathematical function for describing a sound wave. There is the the main data chunk, as well as the name chunk, artist chunk, copyright chunk, etc, where additional data can be added for those categories. It cannot be based on RIFF. They are very similar. The file format differs slightly, but the digital information is stored as an exact mathematical representation of the waveform.
The general rule of thumb is if you record at 16 bit, render the files at 16 bit. If you record at 24 bit, render your mixes at 24 bit. Files can always be downsampled to a lower bit rate. For example 24 bit can easily be downsampled to 16, but once you are at 16, going back to 24 bit is pretty useless.
With AIFF being optimized for motorola processor, and WAV files optimized for Intel based microprocessors, but really there is no difference in performance. The only difference is the way they are stored on disk. One has the most significant byte first and the other one last,don't remember which is which.
The file header is probably different as well,have'nt looked on the AIFF specs. But to all intents and purposes they're the same. With the exception of compability of course. My Studio. They are both bit linear integer formats. The only differences are in how the data is organized in the files.
More compatible how? I know that aiff will make it through the internet ftp, email, etc. I haven't tried it much. The big advantage, is using Bwav isnatead. A sit contains timecode info. Aif doesn't.
I believe since. I would think a cross-platform app or plug could potentially have the same problem. NI Battery 3 is a little funky that way on my mac. But then again, Battery isn't just buggy, it's a giant cockroach.
That aside, yeah, Broadcast WAV allows you to embed a lot of media-related info. Not all media apps can address that info, however. They are practically the same thing. I am pretty sure awhile ago I renamed a.
0コメント